Blog Layout

ALWAYS Use a Headcover with Every animal – or Should We?

Dr. Mark • June 10, 2020
Head cover for deer chemically immobilized.

For decades, I have been teaching that we should always use a headcover with every animal we chemically immobilize. Always. Last night I watched a very high-end documentary about wildlife research and one of the more prominent researchers never used headcovers when drugging their bears. The film directors and the bear researcher who I respect obviously cared deeply for each animal yet the uncovered face of the drugged bears seemed out of place to me. The film had me pondering about my strong stance about using headcovers.


I realized that my reasons for stressing the use of headcover with every animal fall into several categories: 1) Animal care, 2) Human Safety, and 3) Respect for the animal. Here are the pros and cons for using a headcover with chemically immobilized animals….

Animal Care

Covering the eyes of an anesthetized animal can protect their eyes from dirt, debris, and insects. On a sunny day it will shade the retinas and reduces drying of the cornea. (The professional standard is to also treat the eyes of anesthetized animals with steroid-free ophthalmic drops or ointment. Drops are easier.)


Psychologically it is easier for the animals. I have seen wild caught wolves burying their heads in straw with the rest of their body in the open. It is almost as if they feel safer with their head covered.


Human Safety

Some drug combinations, such as ketamine and xylazine, can produce a sudden wake-up as the drugged animal transitions from anesthesia (unresponsive) to sedation (responsive). Imagine a handler working with a coyote, mountain lion, or bear and focusing on radio-collaring, annual medical treatments, or blood collection and then the animal suddenly wakes up. This can compromise human safety or turn it into a rodeo with handlers struggling for control with physical restraint.


Imagine a waking animal becoming responsive and watching the activity around them. A headcover will reduce the frequency of sudden wake ups and increase human safety by minimizing stimulus. Yes, a covered animal can still feel the handlers working on them (there are ways to touch and handle drugged animals that also reduce sudden wake-ups), but the head cover really makes a difference. Sometimes with sedate (responsive) animals, the only thing between the handler and the awake animal is the head cover. It makes a huge difference.


Practical Reasons for Not Using A Headcover

The effects of many drug combinations, such as Telazol are long lasting and result in gradual recoveries rather than sudden wake-ups. Handlers may reason that they do not need a headcover for human safety when the drug combination is long acting.


We often check the eyes for assessing depth of anesthesia and the headcover blocks our view. The headcover can also make it harder to examine the mouth, color of gums, and capillary refill time. If the animal is sedate (responsive), quiet only because of the head cover, it can be risky to quickly remove it to check the eyes so it is important to be careful. In my chemical capture courses, I teach some basic safety measures for how to remove the head cover when it must be removed.


A headcover can also be a bother or distraction blowing away when working around helicopters. Heavier leather headcovers work better for these conditions.



Respect for the Animal

Wolf aand quick muzzle

I do not know why, but for me covering the head of the drugged animal shows care and respect for the animal. Imagine seeing a picture on the front page of your newspaper showing a biologist standing over a drugged wolf that entered the city. Without the headcover you see the animal’s glazed eyes and tongue hanging out. To the public it can look a bit cruel or at the least uncaring.


When I was wildlife veterinarian for Yellowstone National Park and the Project Veterinarian for the 1995-96 Wolf Reintroduction Program I was filmed a lot and I came to realize that in most cases what looked good was also good for the animal.


James Bay Wolf without headcover

News reporters often ask us to take off the headcover to get photos of the animal. I would tell the reporter that I know they want what is best for the animal so we should leave the headcover on. It makes for a better, more caring, professional presentation.


We as animal professionals have a responsibility to demonstrate caring, respectful, and compassionate tools and techniques whenever we chemically immobilize animals.

In Summary

Wolf muzzled and with head cover after being chemically immobilized

I hope zoo and wildlife professionals use headcovers whenever they chemically immobilize an animal. I strongly believe that the pros outweigh the cons. It protects their eyes and it can increase human safety. From a practical perspective the headcover is an important tool for the field. For me covering the animal’s eyes (for some reason) is also a statement of care and respect for the animal. And it looks more professional. It is one of several tools that is good for the animal, good for the handler, and good for the profession.

This and other practical and field-based tools are covered in more detail in my live and online chemical capture courses.


Do you think the headcover is important? Why or why not? Is using a headcover with every animal a professional standard? From around the world, I would love to hear from you.  Dr. Mark

Share with your Connections

More articles for you....

By Elizabeth Anne Johnson September 4, 2024
"Dear Colleagues, I'm proud to announce that my wife, Elizabeth, has published her first book! In this blog article, Elizabeth describes how the five Chinese elements can help us "know our dog's true nature". This is a fun way to better understand your dog and better know yourself and your colleagues! Both Elizabeth and I, with domestic animals and wildlife, teach others how to better understand the animals, how to better care for them, and what the animals can teach us. Have fun with this!" Dr. Mark
Cover of a Visual Guide to Wolf Dentition and Age Determination by Tyler Brassington
By Tyler Brasington May 26, 2024
Part 2 describes how to use this manual for estimating wolf dentition and age determination
By Mark R. Johnson DVM April 1, 2024
As field questions arise, I'll be posting them on this Wildlife Capture and Care Blog. Follow us as field topics come up for discussion.  --- -- --- COVID Exposure to Bait Used for Capturing Lynx
Visual Guide to Wolf Dentition and Age Determination.
By Tyler Brasington February 3, 2024
The Visual Guide to Wolf Dentition and Age Determination is the most comprehensive guide to date, focusing on wolf dentition, and the approximation of age based on visual wear patterns.
In the course of our work on the African continent, we are fortunate to work with a number of charis
By Dr. Joel Alves July 23, 2022
In the course of our work on the African continent, we are fortunate to work with a number of charismatic species and none-more-so than the ones with sharp claws and teeth.
By Dr. Mark May 17, 2022
Here is a great question sent to me from a wildlife biologist taking my online course, “The Foundations of Wildlife Chemical Capture”. Dr. Mark Colleen asks: Dr. Mark, I just finished Chapter 2 where you discussed the importance of accurate weight estimates to determine safe and effective immobilizing drug doses. I see you mentioned observing the ear size in relation to the body, but what are your other go-to observations for estimating body weight for bears? Dr. Mark’s reply: Great question. I have three predominant aspects that I consider when estimating body weight for bears: Ears give me a sense of how old the bear is. As bears grow, their head grows but their ears do not. So a big-eared bear is a small younger bear. A bear with little ears (relative to head size) is an older larger bear. We’re often estimating bear weights when they are in a culvert trap so I first notice if it is a large or small culvert trap because traps vary in size. A small culvert trap will make me think it is a larger bear and can skew my estimate. A larger trap will make a bear look smaller. My strongest reference is writing down my weight estimates on the drugging field form every time we do a capture. We also document actual weight as well. That way we are learning from every animal. When I have a partner at the capture, I ask them to also write down their weight estimate. After we weigh the bear, we know that whoever is least accurate buys the next coffee. It is interesting to note that we have always strived for being accurate with animal weight estimates within 10%. That is the professional standard. I realized that we strive to be accurate within 10% because when we work with ketamine/xylazine and Telazol combinations (which I have done for decades), small variations in dose really makes a difference in the downtime and depth of immobilization. Many biologists are now immobilizing bears with BAM and BAM is more forgiving. We can be 25% off in our weight estimates and not notice a difference in the immobilization. One major reason for this with BAM is that we have reversals to wake up an animal when we’re done. With ketamine/xylazine and Telazol combinations the anesthetics are not reversible. With Telazol, we have to wait for them to wake up and we must wait for ketamine to wear off before we administer the reversal for xylazine. So we don’t want to give them any more than we need to, but we want to be confident that we gave enough! In all cases, we still strive to be accurate within 10% for safe and successful wildlife immobilizations. To recap: Look at the ears Look at the culvert size Write down both estimated weight and actual weight on the field form so we learn from each animal. Care to learn more? Register for the online course, “The Foundations of Wildlife Chemical Capture“ .
Dear colleagues, it is a pleasure to have guest author, Dr. Liesel Laubscher of Wildlife Pharmaceuti
By Dr. Liesel Laubscher April 30, 2022
Dear colleagues, it is a pleasure to have guest author, Dr. Liesel Laubscher of Wildlife Pharmaceuticals South Africa present this article on potent opioids. Dr. Mark
The Foundations Course Reviewed by Journal of Wildlife Diseases
By Dr. Mark October 31, 2021
It is an honor to have the Journal of Wildlife Diseases (JWD) review our online course, The Foundations of Wildlife Chemical Capture. This is likely the first time JWD has reviewed an online course.
Collaring a lynx in Alaska
By Dr. Mark May 21, 2021
Dr. Mark describes creating new drug combinations for immobilizing lynx Note: This blog article is a bit technical but it covers the basics for how to choose an immobilizing drug combination for a wildlife research or management program.
Wildlife Health podcast - Untold stories from 35 years of wildlife handling.
By Dr. Mark March 15, 2021
Dr. Michelle Kneeland of WildlifeHealth.org is presenting a podcast interview with me as I share my stories and adventures from 35 years as a wildlife veterinarian. Listen to me describe a mountain lion capture in a severe winter storm. Hear what it feels like capturing grizzly bears.
More Posts
Share by: